Why a CISF Officer Slapped Kangana Ranaut: A Societal Problem
Violence cannot be justified for whatever reason. What the CISF officer did is wrong but it raises the question of why people take instant justice seriously. An officer on duty slaps a newly elected MP because she feels it's the only chance to express her grievance. A govt officer losing trust in legal justice and governance - is more of a societal problem than a private issue.
The incident involving a CISF officer slapping Kangana Ranaut is a complex problem that reflects broader issues in Indian governance and society. It raises questions about the trust in legal mechanisms and the enforcement of social norms.
The Role of Communal and Hate Speech in Elections
Election Commission of India is now powerless to take actions against influential figures in the BJP, such as Kangana, who constantly engaged in hate speech. This issue of polarizing people based on religion has become a crucial aspect of Indian politics.
From Navneet Rana to Kangana, the BJP has given tickets to candidates who use hate speech to win votes. The ECI and courts once banned Baba Saheb Thackeray for instigating communal hate speech. However, as a newly elected MP, Kangana was given a clean chit and full security arrangements from the government, despite her prior hate speech on social media.
The Double Standards of Legal Enforcement
The CISF officer, as an officer on duty, felt it was his only chance to express his grievances. This incident brings to light the double standards in legal enforcement. An influential person like Kangana can escape legal consequences, while a common person would be summoned and asked to give a written statement.
Twitter had to block Kangana's account, and commercial brands disassociated themselves due to her hate speech. However, the law works differently for influential people. The election commission could not take action against Kangana, making even government staff like the CISF officer lose trust in the functioning of "supposed to be" unbiased democratic governance.
Accumulated Grievances and Declining Trust in Governance
The CISF officer's action is not just an isolated incident; it is an accumulation of public grievances against the BJP that favor communal and hate speech to win elections. Kangana, as a BJP MP, is a living testimony to this issue. If the ruling party had condemned her actions in private and waited until she built a good image among the public, the problem might be lessened. However, they encouraged her with an MP ticket and continued to exploit her controversial image.
This issue of governance and the power to control hate speech highlights a larger problem. Whether it's the opposition or the same party, the government must handle everyone fairly and control hate speech. The lack of trust in the ruling party and the resultant societal issues cannot be ignored.
Conclusion
Kangana Ranaut's incident is symptomatic of a much wider issue in Indian governance. The CISF officer's suspension and the case against her are important steps. However, the underlying problem remains unresolved. Kangana's continued engagement in parliamentary debates in a parliament known for respectful leaders raises questions about the state of governance and the lack of control over hate speech. It is a societal issue that requires immediate attention and action.
Recommended Actions
1. **Promote Fair and Balanced Governance:** The government should take strict measures to control hate speech and ensure that influential figures are held accountable.
2. **Awareness Campaigns:** Public awareness campaigns should be launched to educate citizens about the dangers of hate speech and the importance of legal mechanisms.
3. **Strict Enforcement of Laws:** The Election Commission and police bodies should enforce the laws on communal and hate speech more rigorously.