The Relevance of Brett Kavanaugh’s High School Behavior

The saga surrounding Brett Kavanaugh's high school behavior and the subsequent controversy has relegated the conversation to a discourse of character, political expedience, and personal vendettas. This article explores why it is significant to understand and evaluate the implications of such behaviors, especially in the context of high-stakes positions like the Supreme Court.

Character and Morality

Every individual, regardless of their position, makes mistakes during their youth. However, when scrutinized against the backdrop of their subsequent actions, these mistakes often reveal a deeper character than they initially present. Brett Kavanaugh's early escapades, a combination of cover-ups, lies, and subterfuge, have been dissected and juxtaposed with his more contentious roles, such as serving in a legal boiler room for Republicans and later working with Ken Starr in an attack on Bill Clinton, the former President.

Political Context and Moral Self-Exculpatation

The focus on Kavanaugh's high school behavior is somewhat misplaced in the broader political context. The tears of some conservative senators, including Graham and Starr, who have glossed over sexual abuse allegations at Baylor University while maintaining their prestigious emeritus positions, highlight the double standards often practiced in politics. Similarly, the loud accusations by politicians, such as Trump who paid off porn stars and openly grabbed women, serve as a stark reminder of the complicity and moral decay in the political arena.

Verification and Evidence

Despite the fervor of the accusations during the confirmation hearings, there has been no credible evidence presented to support the claims of Kavanaugh's misconduct. The so-called evidence, when closely examined, often consists of a bare accusation unsupported by concrete facts or testimonies, much less those provided by the accuser. This lack of evidence has led to a perception that the accusations are wholly imaginary.

The Impact of Verdicts

The political climate during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings was marked by desperation, partly fueled by the loss of seats on the courts due to McConnell's strategic approach. Instead of a fair assessment based on facts, both sides clung to partisan narratives to support their agendas.

It is crucial to evaluate the significance of sexual assault allegations and the behavior of potential Supreme Court nominees. While not every predator acts only once, the general principle holds that those who have engaged in such behavior in the past are unlikely to act out only once. Kavanaugh's behavior, therefore, serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for repeat offenses and the gravity of such actions in positions of power.

Candidates for the Supreme Court should be evaluated based on their demonstrated character, humility, and the ability to show gratitude. Self-pity and arrogance have no place in office where the duty is to serve the people with humility and integrity. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg once said, 'A life is not enough for a lifetime appointment,' emphasizing the ephemeral nature of our human imperfections and the need for supreme court justices to transcend their flaws.

Conclusion

The relevance of Brett Kavanaugh’s high school behavior, though often overshadowed by political fervor and personal vendettas, remains a vital aspect of his character. It is essential to ensure that those who sit on the Supreme Court, the highest and most prestigious judicial office in the United States, demonstrate not only legal acumen but also moral character. The decisions made by the Supreme Court have far-reaching consequences, making it imperative to hold nominees to a high standard of behavior and morality.