The Ideological Critique of Arvind Kejriwal: Vision and Performance
Arvind Kejriwal, the charismatic and controversial leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), is often praised for his vision and criticized for his performance. In this article, we critically examine Kejriwal's political ideology and question the disconnect between his rhetoric and actions.
Kejriwal's Vision vs. Performance
Many individuals view Arvind Kejriwal as a man with a high vision but low performance. While he has managed to touch the nerves of literate and common people, his approach to governance often falls short of expectations. Some claim that Kejriwal's political insignificance before the Aam Aadmi Party's formation is evident in both his decision-making and the implementation of policy.
For instance, when Kejriwal and his karyakarta members protested by gathering at India Gate, the media portrayed it as a 'common people of India' protest. However, the actual impact of such protests remains questionable. Additionally, there are numerous instances where his words and actions have been at odds, leading to a sense of betrayal among his followers.
Honesty and Ideology in Politics
Honesty is undoubtedly an essential attribute in politics, but it must be evaluated within the appropriate context. The definition of honesty can vary significantly depending on the social, cultural, and political environment. Kejriwal and many Indians have been criticized for their simplistic view of corruption, which often focuses solely on financial terms. However, there are other forms of corruption, such as academic corruption, which involves the manipulation of historical narratives or the misrepresentation of core values.
Take, for example, the 'Left' writings on Indian history, which can be seen as a form of academic corruption. The glorification of foreign ideologies and the underestimation of Indian achievements undermine the importance of holistic national development. Similarly, concepts such as secularism, equality, and even feminism are often corrupted, leading to a distorted understanding of these values.
A Lack of Ideological Clarity
Some argue that Arvind Kejriwal lacks a clear ideological framework. Despite this, his influence in Indian politics is undeniable. Kejriwal is neither born into a politically active family nor does he rely on muscle power. His rise to prominence is self-driven, and not supported by traditional political machinery or backing from industrialists or media moguls. Instead, he has built an empire of support through unconventional means.
This brings us to the question of whether being an unschooled but politically aware individual can achieve great things. History is replete with individuals who were not born geniuses but transformed into influential figures. Just as Steve Jobs was not the same person who introduced the iPad as he was in 2007, great leaders evolve and adapt to fit changing circumstances. The journey of Mahatma Gandhi is a prime example, as his views evolved from opposing railways and industries to advocating for them as a means of freedom.
Kejriwal's journey, however arduous and controversial, is a testament to the power of individual initiative and the potential for change. People do not need to wait for prophets or influencers; they can create their own path and inspire others to join them.
Conclusion
Arvind Kejriwal's ideology is a subject of intense debate. While his vision for a politically engaged and law-abiding society is noble, his performance has been a point of contention. Evaluating his ideological framework requires a nuanced understanding of the context in which he operates and the evolution of his views over time. Kejriwal's journey, much like the journeys of many historic figures, is marked by both success and frustration. Yet, his ability to challenge the status quo and bring about change should not be underplayed.