Introduction

The decision to remove the picture of Queen Elizabeth II from the University of Oxford is a matter of much debate among various stakeholders. This decision involves considering historical context, institutional values, and the perspectives of the university community. This article explores the arguments for and against removing such a piece of historical and cultural heritage.

Arguments for Removal

Changing Values

Some argue that the monarchy represents colonialism and imperialism, and retaining the image could be seen as endorsing outdated values. This view suggests that the presence of such imagery might alienate a segment of the student body who do not share the same historical perspective or cultural background. For instance, in an increasingly diverse society, removing such symbols could be viewed as a step towards creating a more inclusive environment that reflects the university's commitment to equality and respect for all cultures. As Keith Stevenson stated, 'the people who request the removal are not 10 of the value of the Queen,' highlighting that changing societal values and inclusivity should be considered.

Diversity and Inclusion

Supporters of removal argue that the picture of Queen Elizabeth II symbolizes historical structures that are not universally inclusive. In today's society, where diversity and inclusion are paramount, removing outdated symbols can foster a more welcoming atmosphere. Anne '@Ann' expressed concerns about the potential 'respect for tradition' at the expense of marginalized groups: 'The future members of Parliament. God help us all.' This highlights the tension between maintaining traditions and embracing a more inclusive society.

Arguments Against Removal

Historical Significance

Proponents of keeping the picture argue that Queen Elizabeth II was a significant figure in British history and her image may be seen as part of the university's heritage. The University of Oxford has a rich and storied history, and maintaining elements of that history can enhance its appreciation. As Anne pointed out, 'Oxford has been there for nearly 1000 years and many Royal and Aristocracy have attended Oxford. So absolutely not.' This perspective suggests that removing such an image could strip the university of its historical depth and cultural significance.

Respect for Tradition

Another strong argument against removal is the respect for tradition. As Keith Stevenson noted, 'We English are proud of our heritage and our Royal Family who do a tremendous amount for Britain but quietly and with no fanfare.' This view suggests that the monarchy plays a vital role in maintaining British identity and traditions. Removing the Queen's picture could be seen as a rejection of these traditions, which many in the community value deeply.

Conclusion

The decision to remove the picture of Queen Elizabeth II from the University of Oxford is complex and involves weighing the significance of the monarchy against contemporary values and perspectives. Universities often reflect broader societal debates, and such decisions can have far-reaching implications. Ultimately, the community must engage in meaningful discussions to find a balance that respects historical heritage while also fostering an inclusive environment. As Keith Stevenson pointed out, 'Under no circumstances. It is dreadful to think we are educating such an un-patriotic bunch of ner-do-wells.' The future of the university and its relationship with the community will depend on the outcome of these discussions.