Is It Benevolent to Judge Improper Grammar Use?

Judging people for their grammar can be a double-edged sword in the digital and social landscape we inhabit today. Here are some points to consider when evaluating whether such judgments are justified or fruitful.

Context Matters

The context in which grammar is used is crucial. In formal settings such as academic writing or professional communication, proper grammar is often expected. This ensures clarity, professionalism, and respect for the conventions of the medium. However, in casual conversations or social media, people may prioritize expression over grammatical correctness. For instance, in my work environment, we repair things. When coworkers mention that a piece of equipment is 'broke', seasoned team members might immediately respond with, Pass the hat…, predicting that the correct word 'broken' is about to follow.

Language Evolution

Language is always evolving, and what may be considered improper today might be part of tomorrow's linguistic norms. Ignoring this evolution can lead to missed opportunities. It's important to recognize that language changes to meet the needs of its users. Overlooking this can result in a rigid and out-of-touch understanding of communication. For example, the informal language used in social media and digital communication might be different from the formal language used in academic or business contexts.

Cultural and Educational Background

Not everyone has the same level of access to education or language resources. Judging someone's grammar based solely on a perceived level of correctness can overlook their unique experiences and challenges. For instance, I, who am a native English speaker, sometimes encounter colleagues who are not as familiar with the language due to their background. Respecting these differences fosters a more inclusive and empathetic workplace.

Focus on Communication

The primary goal of language is effective communication. If the meaning is clear, some may argue that strict adherence to grammar is less important. Sometimes, clear communication trumps strict grammar rules. In a team setting, for example, if a colleague struggles with grammar but always conveys their message effectively, the focus should remain on the content rather than the form of their communication.

Judgment vs. Understanding

Instead of judging, it can be more constructive to understand the reasons behind someone's grammatical choices. This approach fosters empathy and better communication. When a coworker suggests asking an immigrant for a spelling suggestion, it can be more helpful to acknowledge the diversity within the team and respect the varied levels of language proficiency. Promoting understanding and effective communication is often more beneficial than focusing on grammatical perfection.

My Perspective on Grammar and Spelling

While I, as a native English speaker, value good grammar and spelling, I don't judge my coworkers for their occasional lapses. I respect their knowledge and expertise in their work. Occasional fun with grammar and spelling can also be a light-hearted way to engage with coworkers. However, I do get frustrated with the abundance of errors I notice online, especially on websites. I believe that having a professional image and ensuring high-quality content is crucial. In the work environment, I double-check my own writing and pay attention to spell check to maintain a high standard.

In summary, while it can be tempting to critique grammar, it's important to consider the broader context and the implications of such judgments. Promoting understanding and effective communication is often more beneficial than focusing on grammatical perfection. Let's strive to be more empathetic and open-minded in our approach to language.