Government’s Decision to Merge Public Sector Banks: Opportunities and Challenges
As a retired banker, my initial thoughts on the decision to merge 10 public sector banks into four are mixed. While the move aims to create stronger, more efficient entities capable of competing internationally, there are several concerns that need to be addressed.
The Context: Historical and Recent Reforms
The decision to merge public sector banks is not new. Various committees, such as the Narasimham Committee (1991–92) and the Raghuram Rajan Committee (2014), have long advocated for reducing the number of public sector banks to enhance their strength, efficiency, and profitability. These recommendations were echoed by the government during my tenure as a banker.
Past Efforts and Present Necessity
Historically, the government has taken steps towards merging public sector banks. For instance, during the Narendra Modi government’s first term, Associate State Banks and the Bharatiya Mahila Bank were merged with the State Bank of India. More recently, Dena Bank and Vijaya Bank were merged with the Bank of Baroda. However, the current mega merger is a more significant step, necessitated by the rising Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and the need to strengthen the banking sector.
Reasons for the Mergers
The primary reason for this move is to address the growing NPAs and ensure better operational efficiency. According to media reports, past governments and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) failed to properly monitor the banks, leading to mounting financial losses. The present government sees this as an opportunity to make the banks robust and capable of withstanding future challenges.
Implementation Details and Omissions
The Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has announced a plan to amalgamate the following banks:
Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India will be merged with Punjab National Bank. South-based banks, Canara Bank and Syndicate Bank, will be merged into one entity. Union Bank of India and Andhra Bank will be merged, while Allahabad Bank will be merged with Indian Bank.Certain banks have been excluded from this merger plan:
Central Bank of India Bank of India Bank of Maharashtra Indian Overseas Bank United Commercial Bank (UCO Bank) Punjab and Sind BankThe exclusion of these banks is largely due to political considerations. For example, keeping Bank of Maharashtra out of the merger plan could be a strategic move to avoid emotional repercussions during the upcoming Maharashtra Assembly elections.
Advantages of the Mergers
There are several benefits to the megamerger. Larger banks can absorb shocks and operational costs more effectively. They can also benefit from economies of scale and the ability to tap into overseas resources. Moreover, a consolidated banking sector is likely to be more customer-centric and competitive, leading to higher profitability. Bank administration will become more effective, and loan recovery will be more professionalized.
Challenges and Concerns
While the advantages are clear, there are several challenges:
Past Mergers: Previous mergers have not always been a success. For example, the 1993 merge of New Bank of India into Punjab National Bank (PNB) led to significant operational issues and even delayed the release of PNB's balance sheet. Cultural Mismatch: Winning the support of employees and creating a common organizational culture will be difficult. Each bank has its own unique culture and practices. Human Resources: While the Finance Minister has assured that no employee will be removed, the placement of employees based on their qualifications and skills may create some discomfort. Additionally, the consolidation process may lead to some branches being closed, which will impact overall promotional opportunities.Conclusion
The decision to merge public sector banks aims to strengthen the Indian banking sector and address the issues of NPAs. However, it is crucial to carefully manage the transition to ensure that both customers and employees benefit from the changes. The success of this move will depend on effective implementation and the ability to overcome the challenges associated with mergers.