A Comparative Review of Ramanujan School of Mathematics and Cheenta Ganit Kendra: A Student's Perspective

Choosing the right institution for mathematics education is a crucial decision for many students. This article aims to provide an insight into two prominent mathematics institutions in India, the Ramanujan School of Mathematics (RSM) and Cheenta Ganit Kendra (Cheenta), based on personal experiences and feedback.

Overview of Ramanujan School of Mathematics (RSM)

RSM, founded in 2011, is renowned for fostering a deep understanding of mathematics. Although I have never attended RSM, I have heard from former students and reviewss that the institution offers an enriching and balanced approach to mathematics education. According to those, RSM provides regular classes, live problem-solving sessions, and a dedicated mentoring system. This holistic approach makes it a preferable choice for those who are looking for comprehensive and structured learning.

Experience with Cheenta Ganit Kendra (Cheenta)

My own experience with Cheenta, a math academy, in classes 9 and 12, has been varied. While the institution has a commendable faculty, the learning experience left much to be desired. Here are my observations and critiques:

Positive Aspects of Cheenta

Regular Classes and Live Sessions: Cheenta offers classes six days a week, providing ample opportunities for problem-solving and in-depth discussions.One-on-One Sessions: Students receive personalized attention through regular one-on-one sessions, allowing for tailored learning and support.Research Projects: Participants often engage in collaborative research projects, enhancing their understanding of advanced mathematical concepts.

Negative Aspects of Cheenta

Poor Teaching Quality: Despite the presence of experienced mentors, some classes involved mentors simply assigning random problems without providing much guidance or context.Unfulfilled Promises: The institution promised to cover the syllabus comprehensively for RMO (Regulatory Mathematics Olympiad) and INMO (Indo National Mathematical Olympiad), but failed to deliver.Economic Feasibility: The cost of the classes (32,000 INR per year) does not justify the lack of structured learning and genuine improvement in students' problem-solving skills.

Alternative Learning Resources

In my opinion, focusing on self-learning resources such as AoPS (Art of Problem Solving) books can be more effective and cost-efficient. Here is a curated list of books that can help students prepare for RMO and INMO:

Number Theory

Basic P*rmo: Elementary Number Theory by BurtonIntermediate and Advanced RMO and INMO: Modern Number Theory by Adithya Khurmi, Number Theory Problems by Titu Andreescu

Geometry

AhCoS Intro-Gemo**: AOPS Introduction to GeometryGeometry Revisited: A must-read for deeper understanding107 Geo Problems: By Titu Andreescu

Algebra

AOPS Books: Recommended for all levelsHigher Algebra by Hall and Knight: Solid but not the bestPolynomials by Barbeau: Valuable for advanced learners102 Algebra Problems by Titu Andreescu: Great practice material

Combinatorics

Not Covered in Detail: Recommended resources vary, but AoPS Classes and Pre-College Mathematics are good starting points.

Problem-Solving Strategies

AOPS: For structured problem-solving trainingExcursion in Mathematics: An excellent alternative to Pre-College Mathematics

Conclusion

While Cheenta's weekly classes and one-on-one sessions are commendable, the institution's failure to deliver on its academic promises and the high cost make it less appealing than self-study resources and structured book-based learning. RSM, on the other hand, seems to offer a more balanced and structured approach, although direct feedback from current RSM students would provide a more comprehensive evaluation.

For students seeking to excel in RMO and INMO, a combination of structured books and self-study is often the most effective approach. Consider carefully before committing to any institution and explore multiple resources to enhance your learning experience.